Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a weight of 520g / 18,34oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
