Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 8000 HSX and Shimano AERO XR 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX offers a durability of 8.5 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR 4000X stands out for a weight of 245g / 8,64oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano AERO XR?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
