Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (210g / 7,41oz) and the line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.5 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano AERO XR?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch (5.43 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX
