Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 8000 HSX and Shimano AERO XR 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX offers a durability of 8.5 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR 4000X stands out for a weight of 245g / 8,64oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano AERO XR?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X
