Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and the weight (155g / 5,47oz). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X
