Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX edges out Shimano Catana FE C 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.5 out of 10) and the gear ratio (5.3:1). Still, Shimano Catana FE C 3000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 260g / 9,17oz and a line retrieve per crank of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano Catana FE?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX
