Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
89.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) and the weight (175g / 6,17oz). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano Complex XR?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
