Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500X edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (175g / 6,17oz) and the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano Complex XR?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
