Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 8000 HSX and Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX stands out for a weight of 275g / 9,7oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Delphin YUPIE


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
