Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
92.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X clearly outshines Penn Battle III 8000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) and weight (270g / 9,52oz). While Penn Battle III 8000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
