Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX clearly outshines Penn Battle III 8000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) and weight (260g / 9,17oz). While Penn Battle III 8000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
