Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 8000 HSX and Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX stands out for a weight of 265g / 9,35oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
