Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9.70oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX
