Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9.87oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
