Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Penn FIERCE IV

Spinning

67.40 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.1 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs

Weight270g / 9.52oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €62.40
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX edges out Penn FIERCE IV 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (8 out of 10) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Penn FIERCE IV 2000X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 7 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.