Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
67.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) and line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn FIERCE IV 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Delphin HORNET?
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
