Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
67.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) and line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn FIERCE IV 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Delphin INKS?
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4500X
