Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
67.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Both Penn FIERCE IV 2000X and Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn FIERCE IV 2000X offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
