Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
67.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a ball bearings of 7, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX
