Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI

Penn FIERCE IV, 2000, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 1558702
Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
67.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandPENN
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €62.40
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, Spinning reel with front drag
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €48.10
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC2000 HGS
  • Handle typeHandle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Conclusion

Both Penn FIERCE IV 2000X and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn FIERCE IV 2000X offers a durability of 7 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79cm / 31.10 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X

  • Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI - Fishingbenchmark