Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Penn FIERCE IV, 2500, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 1558704
Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandPENN
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €65.70
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ), 4000D-C, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10426-400
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €175.50
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000D-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn FIERCE IV 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (8.97 out of 10). While Penn FIERCE IV 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?

There are not much differences between the two comparables