Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Penn FIERCE IV

Spinning

68.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.07 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs

Weight280g / 9.88oz

Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €65.70
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.5 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight150g / 5.29oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €635.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D-P
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Penn FIERCE IV 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Penn FIERCE IV 2500X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4+1 and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Penn FIERCE IV 2500X

7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency