Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5,5kg / 12,13lbs) and line retrieve per crank (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn FIERCE IV 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5,5kg / 12,13lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
