Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5,5kg / 12,13lbs) and line retrieve per crank (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn FIERCE IV 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5,5kg / 12,13lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX
