Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) and maximum drag (5,5kg / 12,13lbs). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn FIERCE IV 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Delphin BRONZ?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5,5kg / 12,13lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
