Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5,5kg / 12,13lbs) and ball bearings (4+1). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn FIERCE IV 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5,5kg / 12,13lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX
