Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Penn FIERCE IV

Spinning

65.80 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs

Weight335g / 11.82oz

Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €69.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.5 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight150g / 5.29oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €635.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D-P
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Penn FIERCE IV 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (150g / 5,29oz) and the ergonomics (6.5 out of 10). Still, Penn FIERCE IV 3000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4+1 and a line retrieve per crank of 89 centimeter / 35.04 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Penn FIERCE IV 3000X

8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency