Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
65.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Both Penn FIERCE IV 3000X and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn FIERCE IV 3000X offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X stands out for a weight of 285g / 10,05oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX
