Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn International VISW
Multireels
67.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.68 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1/1.4:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight1590g / 56.09oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €559.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/1270

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X edges out Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the weight (210g / 7,41oz). Still, Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch and a durability of 5.68 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
