Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn International VISW
Multireels
67.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.68 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1/1.4:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight1590g / 56.09oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €559.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/1270

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X edges out Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the weight (250g / 8,82oz). Still, Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch and a durability of 5.68 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
