Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn International VISW
Multireels
67.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.68 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1/1.4:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight1590g / 56.09oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €559.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/1270

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X edges out Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the weight (210g / 7,41oz). Still, Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch and a durability of 5.68 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
