Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD clearly outshines Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (4.7:1). While Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
