Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX clearly outshines Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and weight (215g / 7,58oz). While Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X
