Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight315g / 11.11oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150
Conclusion
Both Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
