Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125
Conclusion
Both Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX and Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX offers a durability of 5.98 out of 10, while Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Mitchell MX2 Spinning?
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (7,4kg / 16,31lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.28 out of 10 (258g / 9,1oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X
