Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.92 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight530g / 18.7oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €138.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29
Conclusion
Both Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX and Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX stands out for a weight of 530g / 18,7oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Penn Squall II Levelwind?
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
- A gear ratio of 4:9:1 (scoring 6.11 out of 10) gives you a nice middle ground, just enough torque to handle pressure, but still quick enough for general use
- At a maximum drag of 14,9kg / 32,85lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- Scoring 8.23 out of 10 (530g / 18,7oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
Similar comparisons

Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX
