Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR 4000X edges out Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the weight (245g / 8,64oz). Still, Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a durability of 5.98 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
