Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X edges out Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the weight (250g / 8,82oz). Still, Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a durability of 5.98 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
