Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X edges out Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (155g / 5,47oz) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Shimano Complex XR?
Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- A 7 out of 10 (5) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX
