Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435

Shimano FX
Spinning
62.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX and Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX offers a durability of 5.98 out of 10, while Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Shimano FX?
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
