Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX and Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X
