Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.04 out of 10). While Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Sargus II Spinning and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
