Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX edges out Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). Still, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a weight of 284g / 10,02oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Sargus II Spinning and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX
