Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Sargus II Spinning and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
