Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Sargus II Spinning and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3000X
