Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Sargus II Spinning

Spinning

2500x

64.80 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.05 out of 10

Gear ratio5.5:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight284g / 10.02oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €71.20
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R

Seafishing

54.90 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.88 out of 10

Ergonomics5.51 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs

Weight625g / 22.05oz

Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €125.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size-
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Conclusion

Both Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X offers a line retrieve per crank of 76 centimeter / 29.92 inch, while Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R stands out for a gear ratio of 4.9:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Penn Sargus II Spinning and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R?

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles