Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin REDIX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605
Conclusion
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X clearly outshines Delphin REDIX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). While Delphin REDIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Sargus II Spinning and Delphin REDIX?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
