Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Sargus II Spinning and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X
