Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Sargus II Spinning and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
