Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X offers a gear ratio of 5.5:1, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a durability of 5.73 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Sargus II Spinning and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
