Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX

Penn Sargus II Spinning, 2500, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 1321597
Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandPENN
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €71.20
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Shimano Sahara FJ, 4000 XG, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, SH4000XGFJ
Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €71.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000 XG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Conclusion

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX edges out Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (7 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). Still, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs and a ball bearings of 5, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Penn Sargus II Spinning and Shimano Sahara FJ?

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX

  • Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.